Netflix is locked in a bidding war with Paramount for Warner Bros. Discovery, with a $72 billion offer, highlighting the...
by Ellis Cashmore, December 17, 2025
This article saved into your bookmarks. Click here to view your bookmarks.
My BookmarksThis dystopian world is not so far away. In the 21st century, governments of all kinds — democratic elected, autocracies and dictatorships — are realizing that their political ambitions can be reached faster and cheaper with the help of cultural soft power, the ability to shape the preferences of the world by art and entertainment products, resulting not only in an increase of tourism and economic growth but also in political stability and longevity in power. The only tricky thing is that citizens cannot feel that cultural soft power is being controlled by government officials; otherwise, it may not work. Discretion or denial is a key part of the strategy, and it’s already happening.
In the US, after the 2025 acquisition by Skydance Media, led by David Ellison, Paramount has taken several steps to align with the Trump administration, including shifting the editorial direction of CBS News. This year, President Donald Trump influenced the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger by favoring the Ellisons, who promised to reshape CNN, and by leveraging his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s firm and the financial bonds he held in the company, which helped secure regulatory approval. With the new owners aligned with the current administration, not only journalism, but also entertainment may be shaped by their preferences (Make America Great Again [MAGA] ideologies) in the near future.
The Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK), Turkey’s media watchdog dominated by AKP members, issues fines, broadcast bans or sanctions against shows that violate conservative, moral or political standards. This often leads to self-censorship, where producers avoid depicting taboo topics like alcohol, smoking, sex or specific political issues.
In Hungary, the now-defeated Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his Fidesz party have systematically restructured the arts, media and culture sectors since 2010 to advance a nationalist narrative. Through legislative changes, centralized funding and the creation of large pro-government media conglomerates, the administration has diminished plurality in the arts, restricted independent expression and fostered an environment where self-censorship was increasingly common. The Orbán government has implemented “culture laws” that give it greater control over institutions such as theaters and arts education.
Fidesz has created a sprawling right-wing media conglomerate (KESMA), which controls around 80% of Hungary’s media market, including newspapers and cultural publications. This allows for the dissemination of a singular nationalist, socially conservative narrative. While the government supports a boom in Hungarian film production, funding is largely channeled through the National Film Institute (NFI), which prioritizes content that aligns with nationalist historical perspectives.
The “narcotizing dysfunction” — the overwhelming flood of information that leads to apathy or inaction towards problems — became even greater with social media, where influencers and fake news flood the population, clouding the real agents and their intentions by reshaping cultural soft power. US greatest cultural soft powers — Hollywood movies, TV shows and pop music — influenced the consumer habits of the planet mostly under democratic values and freedom of speech, even with some occasional alliances with government interests — such as Disney’s cartoons during the Second World War. But what if freedom of speech and democratic values are no longer necessary to create great manifestations of cultural soft power?
In China, the local government of Dongyang, Zhejiang province, has supported Hengdian World Studios’ infrastructure development, granted tax exemptions to companies and, as of 2017, planned to build government-funded studios within the complex to enhance competitiveness. While privatized, the studio operates under strict state content controls and, in 2004, was recognized by authorities as an experimental zone for the national film and television industry.
From left to right, governments are proving that liberty, democracy and freedom of speech are not essential ingredients to make films, TV shows, music and art cultural soft power tools. The dystopian world where you applaud art and entertainment, with the secret blessing of your government, is already happening.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Please read our commenting guidelines before commenting.
1. Be Respectful: Please be polite to the author. Avoid hostility. The whole point of Fair Observer is openness to different perspectives from perspectives from around the world.
2. Comment Thoughtfully: Please be relevant and constructive. We do not allow personal attacks, disinformation or trolling. We will remove hate speech or incitement.
3. Contribute Usefully: Add something of value — a point of view, an argument, a personal experience or a relevant link if you are citing statistics and key facts.
Please agree to the guidelines before proceeding.
Netflix is locked in a bidding war with Paramount for Warner Bros. Discovery, with a $72 billion offer, highlighting the...
by Ellis Cashmore, December 17, 2025
Brazil’s film industry is growing as a cultural soft power, with the Northeast Region taking the spotlight. While Rio de...
by Franthiesco Ballerini, December 20, 2024
The first boom of Israeli TV shows generated award-winning adaptations in Hollywood like In Treatment and Homeland. Now Israel wants...
by Franthiesco Ballerini, August 11, 2022
As foreign-language entertainment grows in popularity, audiences from all over the world can finally enjoy a much broader and immersive...
by Franthiesco Ballerini, December 18, 2020
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.