America turns 250 today. In 1776, America was anxious and divided as it is now. Despite massive problems, there are...
by Atul Singh, July 4, 2026
This article saved into your bookmarks. Click here to view your bookmarks.
My BookmarksFrench historian Alexis de Tocqueville, the man who understood the bases of American democracy better than any man in history, spent July 4, 1831 — America’s Independence Day — in Albany, New York, amused, slightly condescending — and profoundly moved. He marched with a mixture of citizen militias and trade associations in a solemn parade through town to, of all incongruous places to celebrate the secular nation’s independence, a church.
He found the formal speech commemorating the day, delivered by a local lawyer, a banal series of “rhetorical commonplaces.” But the crowds’ palpable dedication to the principles of individual freedom, and the reading of the Declaration of Independence, stunned him. “It was as though an electric current moved through the hearts of everyone there. It was in no way a theatrical performance. In this reading of the promises of independence … there was something profoundly felt and truly great.”
Today, as America nears its 250th anniversary, 69% of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, 59% believe “America’s best years are behind us,” and 57% fear that the country is on the path to civil war.
For Tocqueville, four distinct elements of American history and society explained how America became the world’s exemplary democracy. First, the founding Americans were fortunate, for they created a society without the constraints of a feudal past or an entrenched aristocracy, with almost no barriers from birth on any individual, in an almost infinite and “empty” land. As the Declaration of Independence put it, “All men are created equal.”
Third, crucially, the Puritans possessed or developed, in their isolated yet largely equal circumstances, what Tocqueville called “enlightened self-interest.” This is the natural pursuit of one’s self-interest, while exercising enough self-restraint for one’s actions to contribute to broader social benefit.
Many Americans, however, now perceive Tocqueville’s enlightened self-interest, the strengths of local government and even democracy itself as inefficient, failed or lost. Tocqueville would find that individualism has, as he anticipated, deteriorated into selfishness, that individuals now feel they and society lack purpose, and that community has splintered into communitarian squabbling. Nearly 40% of Americans are now open to authoritarian leadership, agreeing that the nation needs a leader willing to “break some rules” to set things right.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Please read our commenting guidelines before commenting.
1. Be Respectful: Please be polite to the author. Avoid hostility. The whole point of Fair Observer is openness to different perspectives from perspectives from around the world.
2. Comment Thoughtfully: Please be relevant and constructive. We do not allow personal attacks, disinformation or trolling. We will remove hate speech or incitement.
3. Contribute Usefully: Add something of value — a point of view, an argument, a personal experience or a relevant link if you are citing statistics and key facts.
Please agree to the guidelines before proceeding.
America turns 250 today. In 1776, America was anxious and divided as it is now. Despite massive problems, there are...
by Atul Singh, July 4, 2026
Abraham Lincoln’s vision of democracy — government of, by and for the people — may lack a vital fourth dimension:...
by Peter Isackson, May 1, 2026
Rather than trying to restore its image as an exceptional nation, the US should claim the status of a survivor...
by Leonardo Vivas, February 3, 2021
The chaos of this year’s election may well be enough to dispel all remaining illusions about American democracy.
by Peter Isackson, October 14, 2020
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.